Content
Michigan refers wolf killing case to prosecutors for possible charges – Bridge Michigan
Aug
Bridge Michigan
Michigan’s nonpartisan, nonprofit news source
State wildlife officials have ended their investigation into the January killing of an endangered wolf in southern Michigan and are referring the case for possible criminal charges.
In a statement to Bridge Michigan, Department of Natural Resources spokesperson Ed Golder said the agency has turned over investigative materials to the Calhoun County prosecutor.
“The decision about potential charges against anyone involved in the case will be left solely to the prosecutor’s office,” Golder said.
In late January, a hunter south of Marshall shot and killed the wolf, later telling investigators he mistook it for a large coyote. Subsequent genetic testing confirmed the 84-pound animal — two to three times the size of an average coyote — was instead a gray wolf from the northwoods.
Related:
Wolves have not inhabited the Lower Peninsula for more than a century. Michigan’s population of about 630 adult wolves resides exclusively in the U.P., though roaming wolves have occasionally passed through the northern Lower Peninsula.
How this wolf traveled hundreds of miles south of its known habitat remains a mystery, though experts have expressed doubt that it walked there on its own. The wolf had what investigators have described as a “trap wound” on its paw, indicating it may have been relocated by humans.
“If anyone has any additional information on that point, we’d welcome contact with them,” Golder said, referring tipsters to the Report All Poaching hotline, (800) 292-7800.
The primary election is behind us, but Bridge Michigan reporters are traveling across the state to cover the people, policies and communities impacted as the races head to November. Support that work with a donation today.
Wolves are an endangered species in Michigan. Killing them is a federal offense punishable by up to a year in prison and a $50,000 fine. The only exception is animals directly and immediately threatening a human’s life.
As of midmorning on Friday, Calhoun County Prosecutor David Gilbert said he had yet to receive the case.
Records obtained by Bridge through the Freedom of Information Act indicate two men were coyote hunting on the night of Jan. 19 in Fredonia Township, south of Marshall, when one of them shot the 84-pound male wolf.
The man’s companion, a seasoned hunter from Battle Creek with a decade of coyote-hunting experience, took the carcass home intending to have it mounted.
The next morning, he called DNR officer Jason McCullough, someone he knows personally, to ask if agency officials would like to genetically test the animal.
A post shared by Bridge Michigan (@bridge.michigan)
It would be several more days before the DNR’s resident wolf expert was made aware of the incident — through photos one of the hunters posted to Facebook. Large-carnivore specialist Brian Roell told Bridge Michigan he took one look and recognized the animal as a wolf.
But the local DNR officer, McCullough, at first refused an internal request to confiscate the animal. By the time the request was heeded days later, the wolf had been butchered for mounting. Officers confiscated the carcass, but left the hide behind pending genetic testing.
Two months later, tests confirmed the animal was a wolf, but by then the hide had been taxidermied. Officers confiscated the mount, but McCullough invited the hunters to visit a nearby DNR office and take pictures with it.
DNR officials in the past have said the picture-taking incident is being reviewed internally.
Both state officials and wolf advocates have publicly questioned how two hunters and a taxidermist could all mistake an 84-pound wolf for another species that averages 25-40 pounds.
Reviled by some and celebrated by others, wolves have long been the target of political debate in Michigan, where some want to legalize hunting them while others say there are still too few to justify hunting.
Dozens of Republican lawmakers have urged state officials not to punish the hunter and instead called for legalized wolf hunting in Michigan.
Wolf advocates are calling for the opposite.
“Charges should be filed,” said Nancy Warren, executive director of the National Wolfwatcher Coalition.
“At a minimum,” Warren said, she hopes those involved are required to attend a wolf education class and pay restitution. “Whether or not there should be jail or additional fines, I need more information.”
Gilbert, the Calhoun County prosecutor, said while he’s aware of the heated political debate, “I won’t play politics.”
Instead, he will focus on one key question: “Is it a crime or not.”
In an audio recording of an interview with a DNR investigator, the Battle Creek hunter explained his mistake by saying he had seen wolves in Canada and this animal was not “wolf colored.”
A state necropsy determined that before it was shot, the wolf was in very good physical condition.
Although DNR officials are no longer investigating how the wolf got to southern Michigan, Roell, the large-carnivore specialist, has said he’s deeply skeptical that it could have walked there on its own.
Bridge Michigan reporters travel across the state so you get more than headlines, official statements or secondhand accounts. Your support helps fund the trips that allow our journalists to ask better questions, hear directly from residents and bring you the full story about the issues affecting daily life.
Each reporting trip averages more than $600 for gas, food and lodging. Give today to help keep Bridge Michigan reporters on the road.
Thank you to our Michigan Environment Watch sponsors
Bridge Michigan Environment Watch is made possible by generous financial support from our sponsors. Sponsorship supports our independent journalism mission but does not constitute sponsor endorsement of individual articles or editorial content. Bridge Michigan journalism remains fact- and data-driven and independent at all times.
Please visit the About page for more information and to subscribe to Environment Watch. Interested in becoming a sponsor? Contact Emma Carr.
Republish our articles for free, online or in print, under our Republication Guidelines. Questions? Email republishing@bridgemi.com
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Republish our articles for free, online or in print, under our Republication Guidelines. Questions? Email republishing@bridgemi.com
by Kelly House, Bridge Michigan
June 7, 2024
Only donate if we’ve informed you about important Michigan issues
See what new members are saying about why they donated to Bridge Michigan:
If you want to ensure the future of nonpartisan, nonprofit Michigan journalism, please become a member today. You, too, will be asked why you donated and maybe we’ll feature your quote next time!
Bridge Michigan reporters traveled across the state to cover Michigan’s primary election—from polling places to campaign headquarters to the communities affected by the results.
That reporting is only possible because of readers like you. Help us keep journalists on the road covering the stories that shape Michigan.
Make your tax-deductible donation today.
Click “No, thanks” if you do not want to be counted in our site traffic.
